PDA

View Full Version : What Is Gnosis?


Frater Yechidah
04-28-2007, 04:29 PM
To get things started, I'll post one of my blog entries describing what Gnosticism is:

What Is Gnosis?

Gnosis is experiential knowledge of the Divine.

Gnosis is not a scientific knowledge – it is not about books or laboratories or facts. When we think of the word “knowledge”, a huge list of connotations and associations come to mind. “That person is very knowledgeable”, we might say of a professor of literature or someone who has a PhD. The Greek word for this familiar type of knowledge is not gnosis – it is episteme (literally “science”, though often translated as “knowledge” in the scientific and “book knowledge” sense).

Gnosis, on the other hand, is a completely different type of knowing – it is a knowing that permeates the very core of us. It is not based on “theory” or “proof”, both of which change as new “facts” replace old ones and are just as impermanent as the last. When we “plug in” to Gnosis, we access something that is primordial, something that has existed before “existence” itself (I refer to physical creation here) – we access a truth that does not change or waver, the very core of our eternal being. It cannot be measured by intellect. It cannot be summed up in words. It can only be known in the gnostic sense.

Even this very essay is going to fall short of describing what gnosis is. I can give you pointers and clues, and I can use language to stimulate something in you, but ultimately, despite what I say here, I cannot tell you what gnosis is, least of all your own gnosis of yourself. Gnosis cannot be conferred or appointed, nor is it a destination, but a continual unveiling and perpetual remembering of that which is eternal. “No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.” They say seeing is believing, but true seeing is knowing. Let those who have eyes to see, see.

When I say “Gnosis is experiential knowledge of the Divine”, what do I mean by Divine? What is Divine is truly a matter of perspective, but I, personally, consider it to be both Man and God, for they are ultimately one and inseparable. So, this covers both experiential knowledge of God and experiential knowledge of the self, for they are identical. Gnosis is not just about knowing “God is good” or “God is Love”, or even how many hairs he has on his beard – it is the experience of God. When you look at him, he looks back at you, and you look with one set of eyes, not two.

Gnosis does not belong, of course, to Gnosticism alone, for it has been, is, and always will be eternal and perennial, but Gnosticism is one of the few paths that deals directly in the attainment of it. Not everyone needs this path to attain it, for as said in a Valentinian piece, “What makes us free is the gnosis”. Gnosticism does not make us free, but it, like all tools of growth, can help and contribute to the attainment of that which makes us free – Gnosis itself.

- Henosis Decanus (http://henosis-decanus.blogspot.com)
LLLSHJ,
Yechidah.

m1thr0s
04-28-2007, 07:11 PM
that's got to be one of the most power-packed descriptions I've ever read Frater Yechidah...great way to start things off.

I sure can't top it...think I'll make it a sticky though. very similar in many respects to things said of the Tao in my various readings...

m1thr0s

fr.novumorganum
05-19-2007, 01:32 PM
Hey FY

Thanks for sharing that. An interesting read, but I would have to raise some points for discussion:

one issue I would have is the author's grounding of gnosis in an ahistorical 'truth', a thing before existence. While I am in no way disagreeing with the experience of gnosis, or his definition of that, I think it can be dangerous to ground it in a thing outside time.

the things we experience during gnosis; the concepts we access during trance states etc, may very well exist in a mode of time far longer than ours, but it is time.

anyway, I look forward to learning in this forum.

Frater Yechidah
05-19-2007, 02:52 PM
The Gnostic conception of God is that "he" is completely beyond all our terminology, and the closest we can get to describing him is through negative terminology (incorruptible, inconceivable, etc.). Time would belong very much to the realm of the Archons and the Aeons, and since Gnosis is the intimate experiential knowledge of the Divine, and, given the Divine is very much "outside the realms of time", I don't understand your objection here. Time is a limitation of manifestation, which, while part of God, isn't God in his totality.

"The author" is me, btw. Sorry if there is any confusion.

LLLSHJ,
Yechidah.

fr.novumorganum
05-19-2007, 03:12 PM
Cool, I didn't know that you wrote that.

Logically, it is very sound; I was simply raising a different philosophic perspective. So not a criticism at all.

frater luciferi
05-19-2007, 05:25 PM
The Gnostic conception of God is that "he" is completely beyond all our terminology, and the closest we can get to describing him is through negative terminology (incorruptible, inconceivable, etc.). Time would belong very much to the realm of the Archons and the Aeons, and since Gnosis is the intimate experiential knowledge of the Divine, and, given the Divine is very much "outside the realms of time", I don't understand your objection here. Time is a limitation of manifestation, which, while part of God, isn't God in his totality.

"The author" is me, btw. Sorry if there is any confusion.

LLLSHJ,
Yechidah.

very very close to how daoism/zen explains the human meme of launguage vs. the principle of nirvana. Once one obtains nirvana one walks the path of enlightenment(translates into possibly a path of gnosis?) understanding that one cannot place labels/words upon the dao for the perfection is undefinable. I am interested on a sidenote wat your understanding of the gnostic "deity" is. I agree with mithros- you have definately hit the nail on the head with the hammer.

Ci Celli Ddu
07-25-2007, 02:54 AM
Nice post. Sounds pretty much like Kensho or Satori to me.