DNA pyramids in nanotechnology

[baenheh]

We are not only evolving through the light body process our DNA into a triology instead of biology of the human being. We could be creating structures and manipulating forms which could change our concepts about lifeforms and there communications altogether.

here is an article on Nano DNA pyramids.

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20051210/fob3.asp

Since we understand that there is a blueprint of DNA before it even becomes into being, its possible to be like a co-creator of forms in future as scientists are discovering. How far in future do you think we could harness magnetized thoughtwaves from space or the higher dimensional planes and transmute them into forms, changing their very structure?

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040529/fob7.asp

[m1thr0s]

It is interesting to note how many times the really important issues boil down to efficiency and strength. This is perhaps a side reflection but it is something I cannot help but marvel at periodically and it has significant ramifications for those of us involved in *experimental* reality creation. We are ultimately fooling ourselves to wait on empirical proofs of things too vast for the data itself to even be housed in an accessible manner. What we are often really after is strength and stamina.

I have a good example of this on tap someplace but I would have to reconstruct part of it. It turns out that the numeration that produces the symbolism of the TwinStar is not entirely unique. There is more than one way to align numbers 1-10 so that you do, in fact, get a *magickal square* effect insofar as triangles can accommodate this. The problem is that all the other variations I have discovered produced a kind of sigil rubbish...nothing there we can identify as *strong* or *beautiful* or *relevant* in that case to our own physical frames. The TwinStar is unique according to its remarkable strength...not necessarily by virtue of being the only numerical possibility of its kind.

I often see this elsewhere, particularly in creative or exploratory science. We are sometimes a little too fixated on "proof" of a kind that cannot ever be produced and simply isn't necessary in real-life situations. Strength, on the other hand, always matters and always works out to a practical advantage...

m1thr0s

[MythMath]

From the Chemical Knot article:

"The hard part was coming up with the strategy
so that all the pieces would slip into place," ...

"This is very clever and very elegant work," ...
Chemists have "only just begun to explore what kind of
functions these ring structures might have," he notes.

He challenges the researchers to find
applications for their chemical creations.
________________________________________

I wonder, what if these chemist/researchers are very 'devoted'
on an emotional level with their experiments and processes...?

How could they (k)not be...?

If they were, would it affect the outcome...?

If so, could they prove it...?:rolleyes:

It may be just like making collaborative art...
______________________

Working for many years in audio recording,
I found myself conducting and participating
in various types of 'experimental reality creation'...

The studio setting here is very comfortable and informal,
subtle color lighting, geometrorganic stained glass windows
with other objets d'art and countless instruments of all types...

Plus the building seems to be located on some vibrant sort
of inspirational magnetic hot spot...(always a plus)...;)
___________________

Once the musicians are assembled the process is underway...

We're all focused on the flow, letting the sounds, or more precisely,
the feelings that the sounds promote guide our trek...

On my part, I make sure all the appropriate equipment is
connected and adjusted and in position (but out of the way)...

Then I push record...

That's it...for the technical aspects...
______________________

The rest is pure energy work...

I used to say/think that the rest was all psychological,
but perhaps it's fitting to say it's al-chemical...

I found that by modifying my interaction with the artists
(and also the equipment - the gear; the tools of the craft:
mics, cables, amps, stratocasters, egg shakers, etc...)
I could influence how well they'd perform...

By responding in a certain way, they'd feel encouraged and
motivated and challenged to transcend; to tap into the
emotions that they felt in their music and to focus on
them in a way that allowed their expressions to
convey those feelings to 'the listener'...

[It's often easier for a musician to 'deliver' in a live performance,
feeding off the energy of the crowd, but it can be a difficult task
to recreate that opportunity in the studio...]

I've managed to convince myself that the more I can connect into,
and try to 'feel' what the musicians are doing while they're playing,
the better the recorded 'take' will be...

And conversely, if I'm distracted and not actively focusing on 'now'
the player seems less able to 'let go, and let the music play him/her'...

One person's placebo, is another one's cure...;)

The proof in these experiments is the result of 'the process':

Pure, focused emotional energy that's been encoded
and stored on a portable, ubiquitous medium...

A medium that can be readily duplicated and
distributed to anyone, and that can relay
(and re-relay)
that contained emotional energy on request...

Regardless, to a degree, of the recipients'
cultural/geographical/language differences...

[m1thr0s]

the technical side of all of this is a little staggering but it's even more interesting I think that chemists seem to be toying around with pure aesthetics with no particular aim in mind...perhaps less so in the first instance cited than the second...but still...almost an art for art's sake sort of endeavors.

that's a fairly promising trend if I'm reading it right. Only in this way can people stumble onto things that yield a much higher degree of functionality than they might have been striving for I think. At the same time, I get this impression of a monkey set loose in a nuclear facility and this is a little unsettling. But there is no preventing that anyway so they might as well go as nutso as they like...

I have a lot more faith in random creative explorations that strictly utilitarian ones.

m1thr0s

[MythMath]

Especially 'weaponizable' ones...:eek:

mm