PDA

View Full Version : Satanic Alchemy: A Perennial Rant...


m1thr0s
12-06-2006, 01:28 AM
part one:

I'm going to go ahead and start this thread and not even attempt to lay it all out all at once...this is something I have arrived at over many years of study and will no doubt finally check out of this world still thinking about and working on...it's that big...

Somebody in another forum once defined Satanic Alchemy as what naturally occurs when Satanism meets Alchemy...seems simplistic perhaps but it's actually very deep...an astonishingly profound truth...

Now there are diverse branches of Satanism so let's clear the air on that to begin with. I hope to think that this forum will generate the kind of members that can be bothered to challenge their own assumptions and also take the time to look around...to utilize the information already widely available to them. There are a number of pretty good Satanism websites out there by now...http://www.satanism101.com/ (http://www.satanism101.com/) gives a good breakdown of LaVeyan Satanism and other schools...http://www.dpjs.co.uk/ (http://www.dpjs.co.uk/) has a lot of good overview information...http://apodion.com/vad/?id=20 (http://apodion.com/vad/?id=20) has its qualities...and there are a lot of others I could mention but won't right now.

All of these sites should lead you to understand that Satanism is a diverse way of thinking and also that it's something just coming of age really and experiencing a great deal of change internally...it's not all about hating God anymore...if it ever really was that to begin with...

I never really set about to become a Satanist personally just as I never really set out to become an alchemist. These things just happen sometimes and not to everyone at the same time so it doesn't really accomplish much of anything trying to convince anyone else of this way of thinking. I won't bother with any of that then. Instead, I just want to clarify my own take on things for the record...so others will better understand a few of my own core assumptions upon which a fairly elaborate esoteric has been constructed...

For me, Satanism has something to do with what I have come to call "oppositional thinking" and it's really a part nature-part nurture sort of thing not entirely easy to define. It's not really about diadic opposition so much as it is about achieving a "third side" to any coin by means of drawing exact polarizations and then standing back from these. This impulse is especially strong in Satanists...at least in the smart ones...and ultimately lends itself to the conclusion that there really is "no god but man" anyway...that ideas like "motivated self-interest" or "self-deification" are not really personal choices so much as they are the true nature of the human condition itself...Satanism exposes the fraud in diadic constructs of all kinds and therefor stands aloof from them. In so doing, we find ourselves truly the only viable centers of any universe we know...both collectively and as individuals. So Satanism isn't interested in reuniting with "God" and its not really so much about Ego as it is often made out to be...it's a way of thinking that assesses the human animal on its own merits and determines it to be god unto itself for all practical intents and purposes.

Therefor the question for Satanists is not what god may be or not be...but what is man and how does man equate to whole universe, without regard to any outside agent or agency. Satanism has been called "autotheistic" by classical philosophy standards and also "suitheistic" which is roughly about the same thing, though not exactly. It is an emphasis more than anything else...a particular way of approaching the human condition that refuses to yield to makeshift mental polarities and seeks the "third alternative"...

So that's the first part of my little rant and I will soon return and begin to discuss what all of this may have to do with Alchemy...

m1thr0s

-----------------------------------------------------

part two:

To reiterate an important point in all of this so far, I am NOT about to promote myself as a spokesman for all of Satanism. I am an atypical Satanist as far as I can tell which suits me just fine. I don't hate god...I don't hate Xians...I just don't spend much time on hate at all. I am, however, extremely "oppositional" in my way of thinking and always have been. It's not deliberate and it's not "argumentative"...it's purely instinctive. I was not your typical kid by any stretch of the imagination. As a baby I used to wear a scowl on my face that made me look completely angry all the time...though I was not angry...just intense, and never one to believe in much of anything for the sake of belonging. This never mattered to me at all. Things either had to be completely internally logical or I would simply reject them privately. Naturally, this made conversion to any religious affiliation virtually impossible...even my conversion to Satanism was not so much a conversion as it was an epiphany of sorts. My whole approach to esotericism in general has been highly focused on the physical plane and it occurred to me at a certain point that the character of Satan - however polluted - however flawed - is a character whose essential mindset I completely comprehend...and have always comprehended intuitively.

Satanism is not really about "spirituality"...it's not about the war between good vs evil...it's not even about the overthrowing of god as it is so commonly portrayed. It is about Dominion...it is about the principle of Estate on a physical level...it is about assessing the human condition for its physical potential and disregarding the rest, since in most cases, none of that can ever really be resolved anyway. One cannot comprehend the mind of god...it's a fool's errand. One can - at length - comprehend the Body itself and what works and does not work on a purely physical level.

And this is where Satanism and Alchemy begin to merge, because Alchemy has also been highly focused on the physical plane, and on understanding the spiritual in a reflective relation to the physical as implicated in the Axiom "As Above - So Below", "As Within, So Without"...if you study the actual work of alchemists over the millenia, you will find this unifyying thread running though the vast most of it...that alchemists have committed themselves to perfecting an understanding of matter itself and have guaged spiritual matters reciprocally to this particular measuring rod.

That which seeks to attain whatever godhead is possible to be attained by human beings without any regard whatsoever to any god in residence per se is fundamentally "self-centered" and "ego-centric" by default and Satanists generally accept that criticism and wear it with a certain amount of pride because the majority of them inherently believe that this is simply how reality itself actually operates. This is how anything actually gets done in this world...somebody has to take the bull by the horns...somebody has to "play god" in the absence of any other real and physical god.

So what "bull" is a Satanic Alchemist particularly interested in grabbing? Godhead itself, essentially, by whatever means the laws of physics will allow. Godhead is either a property belonging to mankind itself or it is a pointless discussion altogether from a pragmatic point of view. If it is not ours already and it cannot be had for the taking, then it is something foreign to our natures and no business of ours at all. There is no convincing evidence that it can be "bestowed" like a gift from without. We either take it on its own terms or abandon the quest as futile and get on with other matters...

But because the phenomenum of godhead persistently manifests through humankind, we have good reason to suppose that it is in fact a property intrinsically belonging to this particular animal. What is lacking is a clear understanding of the physics involved...of what this phenomenum really is on a physical level. Satanic Alchemy is thus based on a certain underscoring assumptions...the same as any belief system really. It holds that the property of Godhead is an intrinsic part of the human condition that can be fully harnessed once - and only once - its property has been correctly identified and materially implemented. It has nothing to do with archetypes...nothing to do with any other god.

So I will leave this here for now and return again to begin to look at actual models of "universal man" throughout the ages, since those who have pioneered these models across time are the ones who are most attuned to this whole discussion of "Dominion"...

m1thr0s

fr.novumorganum
12-06-2006, 12:35 PM
M1thr0s:

Two questions (and if they are off topic here please move):

1. do you define 'godhead' and 'star' as synonyms?

2. what are the characteristics of the peopel you mention? Maybe after a few examples, this will seem clear, but now I'm curious if you are speaking of the classic types, or a wider net.

m1thr0s
12-06-2006, 01:56 PM
hey fr. novum,

as to your first question, basically yes, but then I also see the terms "Star" and "Universe" to be synonymous as referencing the phrase "every man and every woman is a star" I have never thought this meant "stardust" or any of that trivial nonsense. I am in some ways a classical Stratonecian in the sense that I believe the Universe is sufficient "first cause" unto itself and therefor requires no other God to have created it. In all likelihood it was never "created" at all, though it may yet run through its own birth-death-rebirth cycles...

As to the second question I am a little confused. I was unaware that I was referring to or characterizing any group of people specifically...do you mean Satanists in general? It has been my experience that Satanists seem to mostly always be in a fairly extreme minority...sort of the odd-man-out for whatever reasons. It is very possible that this will always tend to be the case...I am not completely certain of that but it does seem to me to be most likely.

I also have a very difficult time believing that Satanism itself will ever or could ever become a mainstream philosophy in itself. If it were to somehow become mainstream, I think it would have mutated by then into something else...something sharing many of the same qualities perhaps but still not quite the same thing. On that I am simply speculating I think...

m1thr0s

fr.novumorganum
12-07-2006, 08:34 PM
Yes, from your other writings and conversations I thought that was what you meant by star, but I wanted to be sure; it matches my definition as well.

The other question was refering to the last point in your original post "models of universal man".

m1thr0s
12-07-2006, 10:07 PM
oh I see...you mean right where I left off.
You'll have to forgive my sluggish attention span...this was actually written over a year ago for another forum...

The term "models of universal man" refers to various actual models of human perfection that have been promoted throughout the ages. In very ancient times it was often considered possible that humans could, under certain circumstances, rise to the status of a god, for instance. The Vedas promote the idea that human beings can rise to the stature of the Atman (Godman) while still actually being human. Buddhism rejects this, but in name only. It's a rhetorical quarrel really because Buddhism itself projects the possibility of humans achieving the stature of a Boddhisatva, a "Buddha Born" essentially. Christianity is never entirely clear (to my mind) what humans can actually become, and yet this doctrinal omission has itself paved the way for many esoteric sects or offshoot branches embracing doctrines that do answer this kind of question.

Satanism makes no bones about asserting that human beings are born with all the attributes of godhead itself, requiring only the proper application of knowledge and discipline for this to become utterly apparent. Hebrew mysticism speaks of the possibility of humans rising to the stature of a Messiah and Qabbalah has a certain underlying goal embedded in its teachings, the so-called "raising-up" of the Foundation of Man whereby human beings may freely access the full benefits of the Supernals and thus become "perfected" through this process. These and other similar "models" of "completion" or "perfection" is what I was referring to, since all of these have as a common denominator this idea of human beings somehow coming into perfect balance with the universe itself...of becoming therefor "universal beings" in some sense, not limited by their "temporal" or earth-bound natures any longer...

Abrahadabra itself predicts a "hidden" human anatomical enginery stretching all the way to Ain Soph Aur, which, if it happens to be correct, means that human beings are born with the neurogenetic inheritance of whole and unbridled universe itself. We are all basically perfect baby universes in essence. Until these things are proven facts they remain "models" of human potential only, hense my use of the term "models".

m1thr0s

deviadah
01-25-2008, 08:33 PM
Nice thread... don't know how I've missed it! :o_O:
Abrahadabra itself predicts a "hidden" human anatomical enginery stretching all the way to Ain Soph Aur...

I guess the Ng concept can be found in the mix there?

...I want to emphasize how strikingingly similar this is to the doctrine of Ain Soph Aur via Lurianic Qabbalah. At the highest levels, Yin-Yang Philosophy and Western Qabbalah are in perfect accord. The main difference is that the eastern system provides us with a specific mathematics to this unfolding - and therefor - to the logical reconstruction of this whole cosmic heirachy... - source (http://forums.abrahadabra.com/showpost.php?p=29943&postcount=5)

"...AIN SOPH is the unconditioned state of all things. Substances, essences, and intelligences are manifested out of the inscrutability of AIN SOPH, but the Absolute itself is without substance, essence, or intelligence. AIN SOPH may be likened to a great field of rich earth out of which rises a myriad of plants, each different in color, formation, and fragrance, yet each with its roots in the same dark loam--which, however, is unlike any of the forms nurtured by it. The "plants" are universes, gods, and man, all nourished by AIN SOPH and all with their source in one definitionless essence; all with their spirits, souls, and bodies fashioned from this essence, and doomed, like the plant, to return to the black ground--AIN SOPH, the only Immortal--whence they came." - Manly P. Hall from The Secret Teachings of All Ages (http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta28.htm)

:cool: