Go Back   Abrahadabra Forums > Esoterica > Western Philosophy / Tradition > Qabbalah

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-17-2006
DocHolliday's Avatar
DocHolliday
Offline
Kwisatz Haderach
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 83
Default

I don't mean the words themselves, I mean the actual concepts, such as chakras and what not.
__________________
Quote:
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.
— Marquis de Sade, Last Will and Testament
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2006
m1thr0s's Avatar
m1thr0s
Online
Site Owner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,421
Default

I don't follow you Doc...Hermeticism has misrepresented chakras? In any case I don't feel like it's accurate to say that Hermeticism has been an apologetic form of anything...that may depend on who we are talking about though and when. It is intrinsically syncretic, this is true but I really don't believe in the idea of a "pure" religion or philosophy anyway...they are all syncretic on some level. So is art, for that matter...science...most things really...

m1thr0s
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2006
DocHolliday's Avatar
DocHolliday
Offline
Kwisatz Haderach
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 83
Default

I am not saying that Hermeticism has misprepresented chakras. What I am saying is that it's so syncretistic that it loses much of what it borrows from. I'm not sure if that made sense...
__________________
Quote:
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.
— Marquis de Sade, Last Will and Testament
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2006
m1thr0s's Avatar
m1thr0s
Online
Site Owner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,421
Default

I think I do understand that but it seems to me what we are really talking about is intellectual mediocrity in general and not so much anything having to do with syncretic method, if we can call it that...and I think we sort of do have to look at how people typically go about "distilling" data outside their immediate frame of reference. There are certain dangers involved in this but no one ever really seems to address it...very few real scholars in this area who are trained well enough to communicate the proper techniques or potential hazards etc...

On a personal level I think you can only try to be aware of the risks and maybe develop some sort of checks and balances in your own chunking processes...it's almost always a matter of scrutinizing context in my experience at least, so being aware and respectful of diverse contexts is a good starting point...

m1thr0s
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-25-2006
HobGobliRob's Avatar
HobGobliRob
Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m1thr0s View Post
I really don't believe in the idea of a "pure" religion or philosophy anyway...they are all syncretic on some level. So is art, for that matter...science...most things really...

m1thr0s
My own work with the Kaballah ( I don't argue the spelling), is not the "purest or dogmatic" but my intentions are sincere. I ve studied from freemasonry, tarot , and all the other usual sources. But in the end, the fruit of my labor has produced for me a three dimisional, gemstone atom shaped, cube-octahededon like device with 144 arcana (instead of 22) ,12 spheres instead of 10. Its like a globe for my psyche. It filled for me a lot of things that seemed to be missing in the traditional wisdom. Its hard to put all the work in this small space. So im being brief. All the "greats " were experimentors.
__________________
" Eritus Sicut Dieus, Scientus Bonum et Malum "
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-25-2006
m1thr0s's Avatar
m1thr0s
Online
Site Owner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,421
Default

Quote:
All the "greats " were experimentors.
indeed...with or without anyone else's stuffed-shirt endorsements...for some of us, necessity is the only opinion we give a flying fuck about...

m1thr0s
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-25-2006
MythMath's Avatar
MythMath
Offline
MirrorMage
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: here, now, there?, then?
Posts: 3,830
Default

Sounds groovy...

Got any diagrams...?

CG animations...?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-25-2006
Anibis's Avatar
Anibis
Offline
Aton'Aton'Aton
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 3,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HobGobliRob View Post
My own work with the Kaballah ( I don't argue the spelling), is not the "purest or dogmatic" but my intentions are sincere. I ve studied from freemasonry, tarot , and all the other usual sources. But in the end, the fruit of my labor has produced for me a three dimisional, gemstone atom shaped, cube-octahededon like device with 144 arcana (instead of 22) ,12 spheres instead of 10. Its like a globe for my psyche. It filled for me a lot of things that seemed to be missing in the traditional wisdom. Its hard to put all the work in this small space. So im being brief. All the "greats " were experimentors.
Oh, very interesting, I hope to chat with you in the future as regards this. I have similarily come up with an octahedron shaped 'resonator' for the Tarot. I discuss it here. I use 23 Trumps, here. I have developed a tarot which is basically divided into two 'books'. One of 93 components, the other of 39. The total is 132, Which is of course QBL. All of this stuff is in accordance to a little numerological 'bow tie' that I call the abrahadabra key.
I'd love to hear how your model works. Any schematics?
-Ibisis
__________________
Ekil Erif,
Ekam Erif,
Erif Erif,
Di'Maggio...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-14-2008
DocHolliday's Avatar
DocHolliday
Offline
Kwisatz Haderach
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 83
Default

Holy ressurection, Batman!

One thing I've concluded is that working exclusively within a Qabbalistic framework allows one to dispense of tools, ritual chambers, and just about every affectation within magical work. When peeling back the layers of halachah (Jewish law) which have been used to masquerade the rawest essence of Qabbalah, one encounters a system of direct manipulation. The realization that Sammael himself is En Soph Or, and that a life lived according to Qabbalistic principles allows one to liberate the form of Sammael from his prison, and reconstitude En Soph Or within the self in it's ideal: pure, unfettered balance without submission to any stricture. The seeds of Sammael and Adam are within all people, it is simply a matter of awakening the fire which will burn away the earth.
__________________
Quote:
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.
— Marquis de Sade, Last Will and Testament
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-15-2008
Darkwater's Avatar
Darkwater
Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Strathclyde,Scotland
Posts: 159
Default

How does the "Dark Kaballah" sit with the Kabalistic "Grande Plan of Universal Causes"
__________________
*Seeking so as to better define myself,in love*
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Abrahadabra.com ~ All Rights Reserved